The resignations of Provost Gerald Lang and Dean Stephen Sears of B&E from their positions, but President Mike Garrison’s defiance of doing the same was the big story around these parts and through Mountaineer Nation yesterday. (As well as this modest little site – I got more hits on my piece yesterday than I can remember getting ever.) Flying a little below the radar this morning is the news that we don’t need to cry for Lang & Sears – because both are tenured they can each drop down and remain on staff as professors. Lang will return to Biology, while Sears will join Finance.
The American Way is to give second chances (and third, fourth, etc..) to those that mess up. We give most everyone a chance to right the ship and correct the mistakes that they’ve made. Lord knows I’ve had my share of second chances, and while I believe in the principle myself I cannot reconcile this with Lang & Sears staying on as professors. If we are to take the report written as gospel, these two were at the center of the plot to authorize the now-mistaken grade change that allowed Ms. Bresch to obtain a degree that would now be the equivalent of toilet paper if it hadn’t been rescinded. Changing grades for no reason, falsifying an academic transcript, and awarding a degree based on said changes is academic fraud of the highest order that can be committed by university administration. One of the more outspoken professors about the ordeal has opined that it will be difficult in the future to admonish his own students who cheat, plagiarize, or otherwise defy the academic setting. I imagine this task in the future will be downright impossible for Lang & Sears.
Given all this plus the latest tales in the Rich Rodriguez and John Beilein sagas (Beilein sent in his first settlement check this week…along with a letter griping about having to pay it), a local issue with the University and local residents has gotten little attention by comparison. WVU wants to build a new daycare center on University-owned land in the Suncrest area, near Mon Boulevard and Patteson Drive. I ask those familiar with the two streets to picture the area: one half of the intersection is occupied by the Coliseum and parking, one corner is the home of the Creative Arts Center, and the last corner is covered by trees. At least it appears that way from the road, for on the other side is a 50 foot dropoff that eventually levels off into Krepps Park. Up against the back of the ravine is the planned location for the center, as well as an upgrade to the access road for Krepps and improved parking.
The problem isn’t the center per-se; the problem is the access to the site in the first place. To get to Krepps Park today one turns off of Patteson Drive (a four lane road with a dedicated fifth lane for turning) onto Laurel Street, a tight two lane road that crosses a small bridge over a drainage creek and enters into the Suncrest neighborhood. Residents there are correctly worried about the increased traffic the center will bring. Traffic is bad enough (by Morgantown standards, anyway) that one can only make a right turn from Laurel to Patteson – lefts are prohibited. Residents are complaining but feel the University has turned a deaf ear on them.
It’s one of those situations where there are good arguments both for and against the center. The increased traffic will have a definite impact on the surrounding neighborhood and a potential traffic light will further constrict flow on Patteson Drive that already needs a little speeding up. The proposed center is only accessible via Laurel, and building a separate access road from either Patteson or Mon Boulevard would be nearly impossible given the geography of the area. On the other hand, child care is consistently cited as a major problem by both students and faculty. (More so by graduate and non-traditional students.) The Morgantown area is growing fast by West Virginia standards, and preschool/daycare slots are hard to come by. We found this out when trying to enroll Garrett in a program last year. I think we went through five or six programs before finding one with space. As more families settle in the problem is only going to get worse, and a large facility like WVU is planning would bring welcome relief.
When I consider what should happen taking both sides into account, I personally think the daycare center is badly needed in Morgantown. I feel, however, that the current location is an absolutely terrible place to build. There is only one access point to the land, and that road is definitely not meant for the traffic, let alone the adjacent neighborhoods. If the university wants to build a new center (and I think they should) there is plenty of WVU owned land in Evansdale that is less than a mile away from Krepps and still conducive to building. Lots of land exists around the Student Rec Center, and the old St. Francis property that was bought recently is sitting there doing nothing. Future plans call for a student center that provides a lot of the downtown services to Evansdale students as well as Student Health and other benefits. It seems only natural that the daycare could be an extension of that project.
Life in the University City just never fails to excite lately. I wonder what tomorrow brings.



